BlogsPolity and Governance
Teacher Assaults Student in Chennai
Listen to the article:
00:00 / 00:00
Source
21 Mar 2025 - 3 min read
Share this post
Related Blogs
Polity and Governance05-Nov-2025
Bombay High Court Grants Bail Decision
- **Judicial Ruling**: The Bombay High Court granted bail to Kafeel Ahmed Mohd Ayub in the Mumbai triple bomb blast case of 2011 after 13 years in prison without trial. - **Constitutional Reference**: The court emphasized the *right to a speedy trial* under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, reaffirming that this right cannot be compromised by statutory restrictions when trials are prolonged. - **Court Observations**: A Division Bench, consisting of Justices A.S. Gadkari and Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale, noted the “bleak” prospects of an early trial completion. - **Cited Precedents**: The judges cited the Supreme Court ruling in *Union of India vs K.A. Najeeb (2021)*, which allows constitutional courts to grant bail if prolonged incarceration violates fundamental rights. - **Trial Duration Stats**: - Ayub has been in custody since February 22, 2012, initially arrested by Delhi Police and then by Maharashtra ATS. - Charges were framed against him on March 5, 2021, nearly nine years post-arrest. - Of the originally cited 700 witnesses, this was later reduced to 400; only 167 have been examined to date, with 233 still pending. - **Charges**: Ayub is accused of providing shelter to co-conspirators, including Yasin Bhatkal, involved in the July 13, 2011, blasts that caused 27 fatalities and over 100 injuries. - **Bail Conditions**: The High Court set specific conditions for Ayub's bail: - Furnishing a personal bond of ₹1 lakh. - Monthly reporting to the ATS. - Surrender of his passport. - Prohibition on leaving the trial court's jurisdiction without prior permission. - Restrictions against tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. - **Future Proceedings**: The trial court will assess the merits of the case separately, with the High Court's observations being prima facie in nature solely for the bail application. This case reflects challenges within the judicial system regarding timely trials, prisoner rights, and the heavy burden of prolonged incarceration without conviction.
Polity and Governance05-Nov-2025
Supreme Court on Online Gaming Law
### Supreme Court Hearing on Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025 #### **Key Facts and Context:** - The **Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025** bans real money games, related banking services, and advertisements to curb issues related to online gambling and betting. - Define “betting” and “gambling”: The Court indicated that regular competitions and tournaments, such as chess, may not fall under this definition and could be excluded from the Act’s ambit. - The law aims to address the risks associated with online money games, citing over **45 crore** people negatively impacted and financial losses exceeding **₹20,000 crore**. #### **Judicial Involvement:** - The Supreme Court, led by Justices **J.B. Pardiwala** and **K.V. Viswanathan**, is reviewing petitions challenging the new law. This includes a request from an online chess player claiming income from tournaments. - A significant focus of the hearing was distinguishing between gaming for entertainment versus activities classified under the restrictive provisions of the law. - The case will continue on **November 26, 2025**, and the Court has ordered the government to file a comprehensive counter-affidavit. #### **Government Position:** - The Union Government, represented by **Additional Solicitor General N. Venkataraman**, argues that the law is essential for mitigating serious risks posed by online money games, which have exploited legal loopholes and resulted in societal harm. - Authorities highlight concerns over addiction, financial ruin, money laundering, and possible terrorism financing linked to some online gaming platforms. #### **Constitutional References:** - Petitioners argue that the Act violates: - Right to equality and freedom of expression (potential breach of **Article 14 and Article 19** of the Indian Constitution). - Federalism principles and the distinction between games of skill and chance. #### **Related Laws and Judicial Precedents:** - Relevant legislation includes the **Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023**, and various State laws regulating gambling and betting. - The Supreme Court has transferred multiple petitions from State High Courts to itself for consolidated hearings, indicating a significant judicial interest in the implications of the Act. #### **Key Economic Implications:** - The government has acknowledged economic distress impacting stakeholders in the online gaming industry, citing job losses due to the restrictions imposed by the Act. - In previous hearings, counsel for affected companies reported operational challenges and a lack of avenues for continuation of their businesses following the enforceability of the Act. #### **Summary:** The Supreme Court engagement with the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025, underscores the tension between the regulation of online gaming to counter adverse societal impacts and the rights of individuals and businesses within the gaming sector. There is potential for ongoing legal battles over the balance of regulation and individual rights, with significant implications for the future of online competitive gaming in India.
Polity and Governance04-Nov-2025
Jain Monk Ends Hunger Strike
### Exam-Focused Notes on Pigeon Shelter Protests and Government Response #### Key Events: - **Indefinite Hunger Strike**: Jain monk Nileshchandra Vijay initiated a hunger strike at Azad Maidan, Mumbai, demanding the restoration of the Dadar pigeon shelter (Kabutarkhana) alongside other demands. - **Government Engagement**: After discussions with Cabinet Minister Mangal Prabhat Lodha and Assembly Speaker Rahul Narwekar, the monk ended his protest, contingent upon a promise of discussion regarding the issues within 15 days with Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis. #### Primary Demands: 1. **Restoration of the Dadar Kabutarkhana**. 2. **Publication of Government Policies**: A clear statement on whether feeding pigeons or birds is banned. 3. **Regular Sanitation**: A program implemented by Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) at feeding areas. 4. **Veterinary Care**: Immediate medical attention for injured or dehydrated stray animals and birds. 5. **Protection of Animals**: Including cows and all milch and farm animals. 6. **Heritage Status**: Declaration of ancient temples and sanctuaries as Heritage Sites. #### Background Context: - **Bombay High Court Intervention**: The court ordered the closure of the Dadar Kabutarkhana following concerns about health hazards attributed to pigeon droppings. The issue gained traction after Shiv Sena leader raised it in the Maharashtra legislative council. - **Expert Committee Formation**: In response to community protests, the court established a committee to explore alternative pigeon feeding sites, resulting in BMC proposing controlled feeding at four distant locations, which the Jain community deemed inadequate. #### Concerns Raised by the Jain Community: - The alternate feeding locations proposed are significantly far (up to 9 km), questioning the pigeons' ability to reach these sites. - Skepticism toward BMC's claims regarding health hazards related to pigeon droppings, with demands for concrete data to back such assertions. A RTI report indicated only two out of 52,000 cases of hypersensitivity pneumonitis were related to pigeons. ### Constitutional and Legal References: - **Constitution of India**: Right to life, which can be interpreted under Article 21, also implicitly includes the protection of animals and environmental welfare. - **Judicial Oversight**: The involvement of the Bombay High Court highlights the judiciary's role in mediating between governmental regulations and community rights. ### Government Response: - Assurance of dialogue and potential action by the state government regarding the needs and concerns of the Jain community. - Public health narratives driving municipal regulations regarding animal population control are under scrutiny. ### Health and Safety Considerations: - BMC's assertion that 65% of pigeon droppings pose health risks has prompted legal and communal debates over the validity of such claims, indicating a need for transparency in health data. ### Conclusion: The Jain community's protests regarding pigeon shelters underscore significant intersections of community rights, environmental ethics, health policy, and governmental accountability within urban contexts. The forthcoming discussions and inspections could yield impactful precedents regarding community-environment interactions and municipal governance in India.
Polity and Governance03-Nov-2025
Empowering Youth through Model Gram Sabha
**Exam-Focused Notes on the Model Youth Gram Sabha Initiative** 1. **Constitutional Reference:** - **Article 243A**: Defines the Gram Sabha as foundational to the Panchayati Raj system, representing every registered voter in a village. 2. **Democratic Importance:** - The Gram Sabha is integral to grassroots democracy, allowing rural citizens to engage directly in decision-making on budgets and development prioritization. - Emphasizes participatory democracy, accountability, and transparency. 3. **Educational Gap:** - Current educational curricula focus more on Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabha rather than Panchayati Raj institutions, leading to low civic awareness and participation among youth. - Young individuals often have minimal knowledge or aspiration to lead at the village level. 4. **Government Initiative: Model Youth Gram Sabha** - **Launched**: Collaboration between the Ministry of Panchayati Raj, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Tribal Welfare, and Aspirational Bharat Collaborative in **2025**. - **Objective**: To simulate Gram Sabha processes in schools to ensure awareness and engagement in local governance. 5. **Program Structure:** - Students enact roles such as Sarpanch, ward members, and health workers to discuss and deliberate on village plans. - Supported by teacher training and incentives (prizes, certificates) to enhance participation. 6. **Implementation Phases:** - **Phase 1**: Pilot in over 1,000 schools across **28 States and 8 Union Territories**. Includes: - 600 Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas - 200 Eklavya Model Residential Schools - Selected Zilla Parishad schools in Maharashtra - Over **1,238 teachers** trained from various states, with ongoing training for more educators. 7. **Successful Pilot Programs:** - Conducted at Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Baghpat (Uttar Pradesh) and Eklavya Model Residential School Alwar (Rajasthan). - Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Sitapur (Rajasthan) engaged over **300 students** in a Model Youth Gram Sabha. 8. **Future Plans:** - **Phase 2**: Aim to expand the initiative to all state-run schools in India beyond central institutions, enhancing democratic education and civic participation. 9. **Broader Impact on Civic Education:** - Aims to cultivate civic pride and local leadership among students, ensuring they appreciate the importance of their participation in the democratic process. - Engaging students in debates and resolutions promotes critical life skills and understanding of civic responsibilities. 10. **Vision for India:** - To align with the goal of a **Viksit Bharat** (Developed India) where citizen engagement in governance is regarded as a shared responsibility. - Encourages a culture of active participation, making democracy a lived reality rather than an abstract concept. 11. **Conclusion:** - The Model Youth Gram Sabha represents a foundational shift in civic education, aiming to instill the belief that local governance is as significant as national governance, enhancing the future of participatory democracy in India.
Polity and Governance03-Nov-2025
Student's Fight for Election Inclusion
### Key Points from the Article #### Student Union Elections and Age Restrictions - **Nominee:** Sandesh Shivkumar Sonkamble, 24, a final-year BA student at JNU. - **Disability:** Lives with Osteogenesis Imperfecta; categorized under locomotor disability. - **Age Restrictions:** Per Lyngdoh Committee guidelines: - Undergraduate candidates: 17-22 years - Postgraduate students: 24-25 years - PhD scholars: Up to 28 years - **Current Status:** Mr. Sonkamble's age exceeds eligibility limits set by these guidelines. #### Legal Framework and Rights - **Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016:** - Provides age relaxation up to 5 years for Persons with Benchmark Disabilities (PwBD) in higher education. - **Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT):** - Offers a relaxation of 10 years in central recruitment, 15 years for SC/ST candidates. #### Appeal Process - Mr. Sonkamble has appealed to JNU Vice-Chancellor Santishree Dhulipudi Pandit for relaxation of the age limit for candidates with disabilities. - JNUSU elections are conducted independently by a student-run Election Committee, which stated adherence to the guidelines is mandatory. - Officials indicated that judicial intervention might be necessary for a policy change. #### Social Background and Personal Challenges - **Family Background:** Comes from a Dalit family in Maharashtra’s Latur district; faced social stigma and financial hardships during early education. - **Education Journey:** Delayed schooling due to safety concerns; completed schooling at the age of 21. - **Living Conditions:** Currently uses an electric wheelchair for mobility on campus; requires assistance for navigating JNU's challenging terrain. #### Election Objectives - **Campaign Goals:** If elected, Mr. Sonkamble aims to enhance accessibility at JNU—implementing ramps, lifts, and improved pathways for disabled students. - **Representation Concern:** Highlights the lack of representation of students with disabilities in student unions and government, advocating for better visibility of their issues. #### Legal Action - Mr. Sonkamble is consulting lawyers to file a petition for greater age flexibility for students with disabilities in student elections, emphasizing that success could set a national precedent. ### Conclusion Mr. Sonkamble's situation underscores significant issues surrounding age restrictions for student electoral participation, accessibility for differently-abled persons in educational institutions, and the practical application of disability laws in India. His appeal and potential court action reflect ongoing challenges faced by individuals with disabilities within academic and political frameworks.